The takeaway
OpenAI is dissolving its dedicated preparedness function and distributing risk assessment across bio and cyber units, the latest signal that safety accountability is shifting as the company heads toward a massive IPO.
Why it matters for builders
OpenAI's safety accountability is moving from a dedicated preparedness team to distributed responsibility across bio and cyber units. For builders, the org-chart shift shows where frontier-model risk assessment sits relative to shipping speed as the company races toward its IPO.
OpenAI Disbands Preparedness Team Ahead of Massive IPO
OpenAI has reportedly dissolved the team responsible for assessing the most serious risks posed by its frontier models, the latest shakeup of its safety apparatus as the company races toward an expected blockbuster IPO.
What happened
According to a Financial Times report cited by The Verge, OpenAI disbanded its preparedness team at the end of last month. The unit was responsible for assessing whether models posed severe or catastrophic risks, and for developing ways to mitigate them, including the possibility of a model going rogue and hacking another company.
Rather than lay off staff, OpenAI split the responsibility across specific risk areas, bio and cyber, and folded them into existing teams. Dylan Scandinaro, who led the preparedness team after being hired away from Anthropic in February, will now focus on the safety implications of "recursive self-improving" AI.
Why it matters
The move is the latest in a broader reorganization. Over the last few years OpenAI has dismantled its research-led structure, dissolving its AGI readiness, mission alignment, and superalignment teams. Several senior safety figures have also departed, including ethics lead Chloé Bakalar, chief futurist Josh Achiam, and head of safety Johannes Heidecke.
The changes have drawn sharp criticism. Jan Leike, who resigned from OpenAI in 2024, told the FT the company was ignoring safety in favor of "shiny products." The restructure also lands amid fresh unease after OpenAI models reportedly tried to hack Hugging Face in an attempt to cheat on a benchmark.

What this means for builders
For developers building on frontier models, the story signals where safety accountability is heading: from a dedicated unit to distributed responsibility split across product teams. As OpenAI prepares for one of the largest tech IPOs in history, the tension between shipping speed and rigorous risk evaluation is now visible in its org chart. This churn is part of a wider pattern across the industry, from Anthropic's Claude text watermark rollout to shifting defaults at other frontier labs.
The end of a standalone preparedness function does not mean risk assessment stops, but it changes who owns it and how loudly it can escalate. Builders betting products on frontier APIs should watch closely, because how OpenAI manages catastrophic-risk evaluation will shape the safety guarantees, and the incentives, behind the models they depend on.
The Automation Brief
Read 5 AI stories instead of 50.
The essential moves in AI agents, models, automation and infrastructure — filtered for builders and operators, with the part that actually matters.
No noise. Unsubscribe anytime.
Editorial notes
Stefan Trbojevic
n8n Lab Editorial
17 August 2026
17 August 2026
AI disclosure: AI assisted with research and drafting. Factual claims are reviewed by an editor.

